Looking for something?

Showing posts with label Rock Flowers. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Rock Flowers. Show all posts

Saturday, July 12, 2025

YouTube speaks: twenty-four "weird" dolls of the sixties and seventies

This one is another post inspired by YouTube; I'm always on YouTube, so I may make this a series.  Anyway, during one of my nightly YouTube benders I found this video about twenty-four dolls from the sixties and seventies that might be considered odd, either back then or now.  I thought it was interesting and decided to issue my opinions, because my opinions are SOOOOOOO important!  The video can be found here, and spoilers:  some of 'em aren't that weird in my book.  Kinda like...

ROCK FLOWERS

COMPANY:  Mattel
YEARS OF PRODUCTION:  1971-1973

Rock Flowers were kinda Mattel's answer to Dawn, small dollhouse-sized dolls that wore bright, trendy-for-the-era clothes, bent their arms and legs, and danced on record players.  The dolls were music-themed and came with their own records, but otherwise they look pretty innocent to me.  The narrator wasn't a big fan of how their doll smelled, and the doll wouldn't sit up for tea parties either.  Legit gripes, both of those.  One of my "scented" dolls stunk up her whole box, and I HATE it when I want my dolls to sit up and they won't.  The narrator also critiqued the Rock Flowers' staring eyes, and I think that critique IS dumb because all dolls stare.  Smart Dolls, Mumpy Terri Lee, Cabbage Patch Kids, American Girls, Barbie, they all stare.  

WEIRD FACTOR:  2 out of 10.  I don't really find these weird at all, in fact.  They're dated a bit, yes, but then so are many dolls of this era.  My review on Heather can be seen here.

DUSTY/SKYE

COMPANY:  Kenner
YEARS OF PRODUCTION:  1974

Dusty and her friend Skye were sports-themed dolls, apparently designed to get girls active.  The duo could ski, play golf, and play tennis.  The narrator says that when their friend's Dusty did ski she made a "nails on a chalkboard" noise.  They also weren't in love with the dolls' faces...or their hair, or their clothes.  Dusty and Skye apparently had nice sets of joints, but those joints cracked louder than my knees do when I'm struggling to stand.  I wouldn't have liked that as a kid; when a doll's joint cracked too loud I was immediately afraid that I'd broken something.

WEIRD FACTOR:  6 out of 10.  I can only presume that Dusty and Skye were created to attract boys and tomboys...kids that don't usually play with dolls, period, even if the doll in question is sports-themed.  If my presumption is correct then the gimmick fell flat right out of the gate.  I personally also find the duo homely, and I know I'm not the only one who feels that way.  Tomboys aren't always plain of face, though they are often depicted as such.  Tam discusses Dusty here and Skye here.

JODY

COMPANY:  Ideal
YEARS OF PRODUCTION:  1975

Copper topped Jody, also called Jody the Country Girl, this doll represented country life in the Victorian era.  Kinda fitting, since Little House on the Prairie was big back then.  Once again, the narrator said their Jody smelled funny, had stiff hair, and stared.  She also could apparently look pretty menacing when wielding a pitchfork.  I personally love her period-accurate accessories,  though, especially her old-timey wall-mount telephone.  

WEIRD FACTOR:  3 out of 10.  Country living was kinda a thing in the seventies, and it still is to some extent today.  The only thing I don't really like about Jody is her skirt, which is impractically long for country life.  But then again, she does represent an era where skirts WERE that long.  Like the Rock Flowers, Jody is a hair dated, but that's all.  Tam also has featured this doll on her blog.

SMARTY PANTS

COMPANY:  Topper
YEARS OF PRODUCTION:  1971

This one is one I wasn't familiar with, and I'm already not in love with the name.  "Smarty pants" is usually thrown around in a derogatory manner.  I'd have liked the trivia factor, though.  Yes, Smarty asked trivia questions, and if you got it right she'd congratulate you.  The narrator called her "bossy" and stated that Smarty was not the most cuddly thing.  Worse, she asked multiplication questions, so that wouldn't have pleased me as a kid.  Multiplication was the bane of my existence when I was Smarty's target age.  Smarty also wore glasses that could throw light wrong, and she wasn't dressed very stylish like.  As a result, the narrator said she looked like a "mean teacher."  Oh, and guess where Smarty's batteries go???  Right up her butt!

WEIRD FACTOR:  5 out of 10.  She's cute, but who wants to be asked questions when they're trying to relax and play?  I don't, even if I do like trivia!  I had a laugh at the battery placement, though.

SWINGY

COMPANY:  Mattel
YEARS OF PRODUCTION:  1968

Our resident Paul Revere and the Raiders fan!  Swingy is a little go-go dancer, styled for the era, and I freaking love her.  The poor love is quite noisy when she moves, though, and apparently her hair would get caught in her joints too.  And guess what else?  The narrator reported that Swingy smelled funny.  Hell's bells, my mama's old Barbie smells funny too, kinda like crayons.  I think that was the norm for dolls of the era, because that's how plastic was and still is.

WEIRD FACTOR:  1 out of 10.  I don't find Swingy weird at all, but then I'm a bit biased because I like her.

CRISSY

COMPANY:  Ideal
YEARS OF PRODUCTION:  1969-1974

Ah, Crissy, of whom I'm very fond.  Crissy and company had hair that grew and could retract again, and if you were good with styling you could give her curls or updos or what-have-you.  Unfortunately, Narrator reports that in addition to feeling nasty right out of the package, their Crissy's hair would break and they'd be left holding shanks of hair.  Funny, I've not had that issue with my dolls' hair, but then I usually just braid it to avoid tangles.  I wonder if Narrator's doll was one of the first issue dolls; Crissy and Beth says that that hair was different from the hair of later dolls.  I've also gotta admit that pulling a doll's hair to make it grow sounds excruciating, but I can't think of any better way to get the hair out.  Hardcore readers of my blog will remember my main gripe with Crissy:  her eyes are ridiculously dark, darker even than the darkest American Girl eyes.  Mia, one of Velvet's friends, has the exact opposite effect; her eyes are a smidge bright.  And yet Mia is one of my favorites of the bunch due to her exuberant smile.

WEIRD FACTOR:  Mmmm...4 out of 10, mostly for the eyes.  Crissy's eyes are WAAAAY too dark.  I might bump the Look Around variants up to 6 out of 10, as the "look around" feature is kinda creepy.  Y'all can read my review of Crissy here; I also own two Velvets and a Cinnamon, and I'm keeping my eyes peeled for Tara.  Tam has a few of these dolls too; indeed, one of my Velvets belonged to her!  

THIRSTEE WALKER

COMPANY:  Horsman
YEARS OF PRODUCTION:  1964

Yes, that is a screenshot, LOL.  Several of these images are.  Thirstee Walker walked, drank, and cried, which is admittedly an unusual combo of gimmicks.  None of my walkers drink, for example.  The water proved problematic, as it sloshed around, leaked from the doll in various unusual places, smelled stale, and undoubtedly caused the doll to mildew.  I'd have kept water a million miles away from this gal.

WEIRD FACTOR:  6 out of 10.  She looks innocent enuff, but why make a doll drink when she can't pee it back out???

CHEERFUL TEARFUL

COMPANY:  Mattel
YEARS OF PRODUCTION:  1965

Cheerful's name says it all:  she could be happy or sad depending on how her arm was positioned.  She could cry real tears like Thirstee Walker, but she had a pee hole so the water wouldn't build up inside and get icky.  Like Dusty, Cheerful made a racket when her arm was moved, and sometimes she'd get stuck between happy and sad.  The smaller variant, Tiny Cheerful Tearful, had sunken eyes that attract dust, throw funny shadows, and make the doll look sick.  I'd know, because I own her!  My review of Tiny Cheerful Tearful can be found here, and if you watch the video, you may notice that one of the pictures of Tiny looks familiar. 

WEIRD FACTOR:  6 out of 10.  That shifting face is admittedly a little freaky.  Tiny Cheerful Tearful also looks a little ill with those hollow eyes.

BABY FIRST STEP

COMPANY:  Mattel
YEARS OF PRODUCTION:  1964

Another walker, though this young lady walks the same way Swingy dances:  by shuffling her feet and swinging her arms.  Like Swingy she's noisy when she walks, and the narrator claimed that this doll could spontaneously walk by herself.  Knowing mechanical items like I do, there's probably some truth to that.

WEIRD FACTOR:  1 out of 10, just like Swingy.  The two could be sisters, except that they don't look the same in the face.  Tam has discussed this doll on her blog.

CHATTY CATHY 

COMPANY:  Mattel
YEARS OF PRODUCTION:  1959-1965

Chatty Cathy?  MY Chatty Cathy, weird?  Well...if you ask my sister then she's worse than weird.  Most doll fans are at least vaguely familiar with this doll, either because they lived in the era, because they saw the GEICO commercial, or because they like The Twilight Zone.  As for weird...well, Cathy doesn't blink when she talks (most dolls don't), her mech made an ominous grinding sound when activated, and...yeah, I can see why some folks would be a bit weirded out by Chatty Cathy.  Nonetheless, to date she is Mattel's second most popular doll, behind only Barbie.

WEIRD FACTOR:  I'll give her a 5 out of 10.  I've gotta admit that it's freaky how she stares and talks without blinking.  To be fair, I don't like that about Amazing Maddie or my other talking dolls either.  Furthermore, I always thought it was odd that some of these dolls declared "I hurt myself!"  Another of my chatterboxes, Teenie Talk, says something similar, but she then asks me to kiss it, so it makes a bit more sense.  Big surprise, Tam also has a few of these, and two of 'em have pigtails.  I think the ones with pigtails are cute.

CHARMIN' CHATTY

COMPANY:  Mattel
YEARS OF PRODUCTION:  1963-1964

Chatty Cathy's sister of sorts, Charmin' relied on records to speak, and that right there is a smidge problematic.  Fans of old vinyls know how records can get scratched, and when that happens they skip or repeat.  This sometimes happened to Charmin' Chatty!  She also was a little goofy in the face, to the point that some folks think she's ugly (I think she's hilarious).  I will say that Charmin' isn't as quiz-kid as Smarty Pants is; one of her records has her making animal sounds, which kids love to do.  So Charmin' had a goofy side.

WEIRD FACTOR:  I'll give her a 4 out of 10, a little lower than Chatty Cathy.  She doesn't blink when she talks either, but as I said above few dolls can do that.  The skipping records are my main reason for her landing a 4.  Once again, please take a look at Tam's doll.  She's missing her glasses, but she's still cute.

TINY TEARS

COMPANY:  American Character
YEARS OF PRODUCTION:  1950-1965

One of the more well-known vintage dolls, Tiny Tears is a crier and could wet her diapers as well.  Narrator says that this doll's voice sounded too realistic at times (so do Cry Babies!) and that she'd go off at random sometimes.  If not properly dried her tears would gather dust and make the poor poppet look unwell.  Hmmm...I never had that problem with the handful of criers that I played with.  She apparently also reeked after being fed.

WEIRD FACTOR:  2 out of 10.  She's a crier, no worse than the Cry Babies of today, though as with Thirstee Walker I'd be concerned with mildew over time.  Thus why I keep water away from Ayla and Kathy Cry Baby, even though they were meant to have water inside them.  Tam has this one too, and hers is really cute.

BETSY WETSY

COMPANY:  Ideal
YEARS OF PRODUCTION:  1937-1983, give or take

Killecrankie, I had no idea that Betsy Wetsy had been around that long!  Narrator says that this doll retained water like Thirstee Walker (and probably Tiny Tears) did, and predictably that started to smell after awhile.  Her hair could also turn green from the chlorine in the water.  Interesting, I knew that could happen to polar bears, but apparently it can happen to dolls too!  Narrator didn't add that unlike Tiny Tears, Betsy's nose runs when she cries, adding another orifice to be cleaned. 

WEIRD FACTOR:  4 out of 10.  She's a crier like Tiny Tears, but the runny nose bumps the weird factor up a bit.  Yeah, we've all had a runny nose from time to time, but it's not a common feature on our dolls unless they're little sickies, which Betsy is not.

BABY ALIVE 

COMPANY:  Kenner
YEARS OF PRODUCTION:  1973-present day (sort of)

We're talking the original one here!  Baby Alive is still very much alive in the present day, but boy howdy, has she changed!  Y'all have seen my little trio, and they look nothing like the doll of the seventies.

The original Baby Alive ate more-or-less real baby food, and she could drink from her bottle as well.  Our narrator hero states that feeding the doll AND changing her diaper were jobs for a biohazard team, and her chewing and sucking mechanisms made ominous grinding noises.  Having seen the food, I have to agree that it doesn't look the most appetizing in the world, and I wouldn't want to change that diaper either.

WEIRD FACTOR:  6 out of 10 for a doll that eats colored sludge and calls it food.  Even Snackin' Sara's Play-Doh turdlets looked more like something a doll could eat.

FLATSIES

COMPANY:  Ideal
YEARS OF PRODUCTION:  1969-1973

Flatsies, Flatsies, they're flat and that's that!  I thought that these dolls were...well, flat, but it turns out that there's more to them than that.  Flatsies could apparently be inflated like little balloons, or little blow-up dolls, take your pick.  They didn't always inflate fully, and over time their air would leak out, which Narrator said was freaky because of the noise it made.  Hmmm...the Flatsies I'm familiar with don't inflate.  They just are...well, FLAT, with legs and arms that bend like Tutti and Todd dolls.  They live in picture frames and thus can double as a wall hanging, so that's something.  Score one for storage!

WEIRD FACTOR:  Ohhhhhh...5 out of 10.  They're cute, they're flexible, they've got rooted hair...and they're flat.  That's kinda strange, but not outrageously so.

BABY SECRET

COMPANY:  Mattel
YEARS OF PRODUCTION:  1965

Narrator's frequent comparisons of Baby Secret to a stupid spy didn't contribute to my enjoyment of this segment.  Baby Secret DOES whisper secrets, but they're innocent little messages that normally wouldn't give kids the all-overs.  Now granted, the whispering voice does freak me out a bit, and some of her phrases sound a mite R-rated to someone with a dirty mind (I admit it, LOL).  Baby Secret also has a mouth that moves, just like Teenie Talk and Baby See 'n' Say do.  Some find that disturbing, but I think it's cute.  The doll's eyes look ever so slightly pissed though, making Baby Secret look like she's about to whisper "Go jump off a cliff."

WEIRD FACTOR:  5 out of 10.  Talking dolls are nothing new, but the whisper sounds a mite sinister, and the doll looks like she might be a biter.  Kinda like Teenie Talk, the same one who asks me to kiss her finger.

I love Teenie, but I never have fully trusted her.  She looks like she'd like to bite a plug outta my arm.  Hmmm, I need to give that dress a bath.

SPORT AND SHAVE KEN

COMPANY:  Mattel
YEARS OF PRODUCTION:  1980

Ken had already had facial hair by the time this guy came around; Now Look Ken had fuzzy stickers that allowed him to wear a mustache, sideburns, or channel his inner Barry Gibb.  Whatever you wanted; I thought it was a riot, by the way, that Now Look Ken's commercial equated a mustache with a villain.  But we're talking about Sport and Shave Ken, whose beard came from this gommy black marker.  You drew on his face and then shaved it off with a razor that didn't actually cut anything.  Now, if you had a man in your life that wore a beard (like I did), then you knew that beards require a fair amount of maintenance, just like the hair on our heads, and you knew what razors were for.  So a Ken with a razor doesn't weird me out much, but the gloppy paint that made this particular doll's beard was kinda gross.  The narrator agreed.

WEIRD FACTOR:  4 out of 10.  The marker looked weird when it was in place.  Indeed, this is the only Ken I've seen with facial hair that looked better without.  Shaving Fun Ken looks amazing with a beard...drat it, I miss being able to take my dolls outside like Tam and Miss Emily do!!!  As an aside, Jenjoy notes that this Ken was the only one with his particular head mold.  Kinda cool!

SALLY SECRETS 

COMPANY:  Mattel
YEARS OF PRODUCTION:  1992-1994

Sally is a glitzy toddler doll from the nineties...wait a minute, I thought we were doing the seventies and earlier.  But as I've stated in the past Sally has a number of artsy little items that were trendy in the nineties, and she carries them on various parts of her body.  Her shoes and earrings hide little stamps, and stickers come out of...wait a minute, her body???  Yep.  I gotta admit that that's kinda weird.  Sally's sister/friend (I'm not sure which) Penni Secrets carries her stickers in her hair bow, which makes a tiny bit more sense.  I bet Penni's bow would be a heavy one though, and I know of old that heavy hair bows are extremely uncomfortable.

WEIRD FACTOR:  6 out of 10.  The child does have stickers coming out of her chest, after all.  I love this doll, though!

MY PRETTY BALLERINA 

COMPANY:  Tyco
YEARS OF PRODUCTION:

Also not an oldie, but she is highly similar to Dancerina and Dancerella, who ARE products of the Me Decade.  My Pretty Ballerina sometimes appears on lists of glitzy toddler dolls, and...I guess she could count as such.  Narrator states that this doll danced semi-on her own, and she'd continue to do so after her music stopped, which they found kinda disturbing.  I'll add in my two cents and say that the doll looks a smidge stoned.  Since she's a doll My Pretty Ballerina also looks robotic when she moves, but...well, she's a doll!  They don't move exactly like we do.

WEIRD FACTOR: 2 out of 10.  I think she's cool.

HUGO, MAN OF A THOUSAND FACES

COMPANY:
YEARS OF PRODUCTION:

Okay, now THIS one made me raise an eyebrow.  Hugo is actually a puppet and is geared towards little boys, and he has facial features that one can attach to make him look like someone/something else.  He's even got SCARS!!!  I love the concept, but Narrator says that it was hard to get the pieces on straight, and they left a sticky residue.  I wonder if that sticky stuff didn't wear off after awhile, and I know darn good and well that the sticky stuff gathered debris with time.  All sticky stuff does.  Narrator also notes that Hugo is weird-looking even without his extra features, with them big ol' eyes that stare.  

WEIRD FACTOR:  8 out of 10.  Hugo is a very interesting concept, but he's still pretty odd to look at.

BABY SOFT SOUNDS

COMPANY:  Fisher-Price
YEARS OF PRODUCTION:  1979

According to Narrator this doll recorded your voice, but the playback wasn't great.  She oddly could pick up on conversations while one thought she was off, and she also smelled like "old batteries," as the video put it.  Now the dolls that I've seen make no mention of an internal recording device, but they were out-of-box so I have no way of knowing for sure.

WEIRD FACTOR:  Mmmm...3 out of 10.  To me she's no weirder than Little Miss Echo.

BLESS YOU BABY TENDER LOVE 

COMPANY:  Mattel
YEARS OF PRODUCTION:  1975

Bless You Baby Tender Love.  She looks pretty innocent, if a little orange.  Bless You Baby Tender Love sneezes when her belly is squeezed, and because she takes a bottle her sneezes are realistically wet.  Narrator stated that they owned this doll, and in addition to sneezing the little doll sounds like she's wheezing too (which she does).  They felt bad for this doll because she was always sick and couldn't be made better.

WEIRD FACTOR:  7 out of 10.  Sick dolls are nothing new, but usually they show some other symptom besides the sneeze, and a lot of 'em alternate between periods of illness and periods of wellness.  Tam thinks this one is weird too, by the way, and...well, obviously I think she's kinda weird, or I wouldn't have given her a 7 out of 10!  I intend to review this doll eventually, but life keeps getting in the way.

GROWING UP SKIPPER

COMPANY:  Mattel
YEARS OF PRODUCTION:  1975

The infamous Growing Up Skipper, the doll who goes through puberty with a twist of her arm.  Skip and her friend Ginger were both in on it, and the backlash against these dolls was so great that Ginger never appeared again.  Anyway, Narrator notes that like several of these other dolls Skip smelled funny, and I think she clicked, and sometimes she'd get stuck between her short/child self and her tall/teenage self.  Poor child, sounds like she was the type who got tall and awkward as she grew.  I don't know which is worse, being chubby during the gawky stage or being tall with big klutzy feet.  I was chubby, my best friend got tall and gangly, and we both HATED it.

WEIRD FACTOR:  7 out of 10.  Puberty is a natural, normal part of life, but I'll admit that a doll that goes through it is kinda odd.  Oh, and by the way, My Scene revisited the growing up gimmick with the Growing Up Glam line.  I'd rank them the same, 7 out of 10 on the weird scale. 

TUB AND TOOT 

COMPANY:  Toys R Us
YEARS OF PRODUCTION:  2014

This doll is modern, not a seventies thing, but otherwise she belongs on this list.  Why???  Because she FARTS IN HER BATHTUB!!!  Let's be real, we've all farted in the bathtub at some point, and the racket it makes is hilarious.  But...is it really worth it to make a doll that does it?  I mean, this doll is completely innocent-looking, but press that button on her belly and...oh, not only does she make the noise, but she also apparently blows bubbles with her butt.  Sigh...I have no other words.

WEIRD FACTOR:  9 out of 10.  What the actual heck???  A farting doll???  Miss Emily discussed this one once, and she too was pretty weirded out.

I'm surprised that Saucy wasn't on the list!  Blythe isn't either, and she was so weird that peeps didn't buy her.  Neither of them are as weird as Hugo with his funny faces, and even he's not as weird as Tub and Toot, but still...I'd rank Saucy a 7 out of 10 and Blythe an 8 out of 10.  Keep in mind that I'm a big fan of both dolls.

Other good candidates for the list would've been Susie Sad-Eyes, Emerald the Enchanting Witch, Little Miss No-Name, and Joey Stivic, the last of whom was...don't quote me, but I think he was one of the first mass-produced anatomically correct boy dolls.  His commercial made a big deal of this aspect.  Furthermore, I don't think All In the Family was geared towards kids, not with the language Archie Bunker used!  I think All In the Family is a riot myself, but then I'm 37 and won't be confused or horrified by the situations on the show.  Thus I think the Joey Stivic doll probably was way over the heads of seventies kids.  Now, disclaimer: I mean no shade towards ANY of these dolls, not even Tub and Toot.  Indeed, Little Miss No-Name is very high on my wish list, and I own several of the others already.  But y'all gotta admit, they're not your average dolls.

What say y'all?  Do you know of any little weirdoes that belong on this list?

Cheers,
RagingMoon1987

Thursday, May 15, 2025

Throwback Thursday review: Kenner Glamour Gals

Casa Pizarro's money woes continue.  On Monday the battery on Mama's car went blooey, and since the car had a few other issues Mama had them all fixed at once, which wasn't cheap.  We all (Mama, Uncle Man-Child, and me) chipped in to pay so we're all strapped for cash.  Good thing I've got reviews scheduled until August, yes?  These little dolls are two more that Treesa sent, but not in the same box as Violet.  Shara is the blonde, Loni is the brunette, and they are Kenner's Glamour Gals.  I was pretty tickled by these, as I'd never heard of the Glamour Gals before.  I can already tell y'all that they'll be great dollhouse fodder.
The earliest Glamour Gals date to 1980, the year of Mount St. Helens, the Night of the Twisters, and a ridiculously hot summer.  That year another Kenner doll was also finding her footing, a sweet-smelling redhead named Strawberry Shortcake.  I bring Strawberry (or rather Orange Blossom) into the mix because she and the Glamour Gals were both Kenner products, but the two dolls couldn't be more different.  Strawberry saw tremendous success, while as far as I know the Glamour Gals did not.
Glamour Gals stuck around until 1983, which is actually a pretty good run for a doll line that wasn't considered a huge success.  Kenner certainly gave the line the ol' college try, supplying these little dolls with playsets, small habitats to live in, and even a Firebird.  There were eight boys and eight girls of varying races, hair colors, eye colors, and outfits.  So Kenner did try with this bunch, and no doubt there were children who liked these dolls, but apparently not a lot of 'em.  Anyway...I'm gonna largely focus on Loni during this review since she and Shara are so much alike, and because typing "Glamour Gals" over and over again gets redundant.  Loni and her girlfriends are 4.5 inches tall, meaning that they're smaller than Dawn (Topper Angie, left and Checkerboard Shannon, right) and smaller than the Rock Flowers, but a smidge bigger than the Fashion Teeners, who tried and failed to compete with Dawn.
Behold, I found a doll that makes Dawn look big!  I may have to do a follow-up to this blog post, discussing the differences between Dawn's Topper and Checkerboard selves.  Shannon is identifiable as a Dawn doll, but she and Angie have a few differences. 
I had no idea that Shannon was the same size as Angie, by the way.  When Treesa sent her to me I hadn't handled my other Dawn dolls in quite awhile, and thus Shannon was bigger than I remembered.  So Topper and Checkerboard are the same size, but I don't know yet if they can share clothes.  I bet they do, but it's always best to make sure.

Getting back to the Glamour Gals, Loni's hair is rooted, and sources claim that she's a redhead, but she doesn't look any more red-haired than I do...yeah she does in some lights.
Loni sports a center part with bangs up front, and the rest of it hangs to her rear like so.  It curls under and sticks out a bit...hmmm, looks kinda like Jessie from Team Rocket.
Prepare for trouble, and make it double!  LOL, now that I look at Jessie I realize that her hair is actually purple, albeit a different shade from her partner James's hair.  It sure looked red when I was a kid!  Anyway, the rooting is pretty good for a doll this size.  Loni has a bald patch showing, but I had to dig to root it up.
Shara's hair is blonde and parted on the left, and it has a bit more volume than Loni's hair, but the length and the rooting are the same.
The fibers are soft enuff, and because these dolls are little there's not a lot of hair to get ratted up, but because they're over forty now the hair isn't as smooth and shiny as it was.  That's to be expected; doll hair ages, 'nuff said.  I can still comb it and make it look nice.

Tiny dolls have tiny heads with tiny faces, and tiny faces are often landmines for paint gaffes, but let's look closer at Loni.  She's a devious-looking little cuss!
I dunno, those eyes look kinda handpainted!  Loni's eyes are green, shadows and all, with light clusters but no pupils.
Loni's mouth is your stereotypical fashion doll mouth, with teeth showing like Superstar Barbie's.  The paint is pretty good for a doll this tiny, though her lips are a little narrow.
Blick, I need to wash Loni's face.

Shara's eyebrows are a little less devious, and she has blue eyes and darker lips, but otherwise the paint job and the head mold are the same.  Her face is even dustier than Loni's is.
Neither of these dolls have earrings, which was probably a smart move.  I don't think their teeny-weeny little ears could handle piercings, and painted earrings would've been way hard on a scale like this.
These little faces remind me a bit of Farrah Fawcett, who was a big name in 1980.  Charlie's Angels was winding down by the end of the Me Decade, but ol' Farrah was a star nonetheless.  Regarding these heads...I haven't seen Erin, the blue-eyed brunette character, up close, but I think she may have a different head from Shara and Loni.  She's got a lot of teeth showing, kinda like Starr's friend Tracy does.

The clothing review and the body review will be one and the same, as both of my dolls have their threads molded on.
One interesting thing about these dolls is that their clothes are often both molded and fabric.  My two are poor examples of this since they're both wearing painted and molded clothes, but more often than not these dolls wore a combination of molded and cloth duds.  Each "outfit" was named, with Loni's getup being christened Totally Tangerine.  According to online sources, this outfit was produced in 1981.
Hmmm, that color looks more Basically Blush to me, or maybe Groovy Grapefruit.  Tangerine is more orange than pink, or it is if the skin of the fruit is any indication.  But either way the name is Totally Tangerine, and the shades are a touch different where the plastic type changes.  Loni's vinyl legs are a smidge lighter than her plastic body.  The difference is subtle, but it's there.
Loni's ensemble may be all vinyl, but her body does have some nice molded details to suggest clothes, stuff like creases on her sleeves and buttons and lapels on her blouse...
...and folds in the legs of her slacks.
Loni's shoes appear to be slip-ons of some stripe, with closed toes and flat heels.  Oh, and they're pink like the rest of her clothes.
Notice that Loni's ankles are painted to look like skin, by the way.  Her hands are too.  I guess it was easier to paint those features than to mold them in a fleshtone.  As we'll soon see, Shara's body took a different approach. 

Rounding out Loni's ensemble is a brown vinyl hat.
In truth the hat is just a ring of vinyl that slips down over Loni's hair.  See?  You can see the crown of her head poking through (and something that I need to scrape off the vinyl).
Still, the hat serves its purpose well, and it throws some dramatic shadows.

Shara's clothes look more tangerine to me, but her ensemble is entitled Bronze Beauty.  This outfit also dates from 1981.

Heck yeah, swimwear, just in time for pool weather...or not.  This May has been kinda cool thus far, but then so was the May two years ago, right before it got blisteringly hot!  Whatever the weather, Shara also comes with a little yellow towel, kinda like Malibu Barbie initially did.  Shara gives me Malibu Barbie vibes all over, but that may just be because I love Malibu Barbie. 
Malibu Barbie was still a thing in 1980, by the way.  So!  Being a swimsuit doll Shara is much more simplistic all over than Loni.  She has few molded details on her body and could easily wear the cloth ensembles that some of the other Glamour Gals wore.  The only molding I see is along Shara's bosom, like so.
Indeed, when I first opened Shara's package I thought she was nekkid, so dim was the light in the front room at the time!  Like Loni Shara also wears a vinyl hat that squeezes over her ample hair (this one is red with scalloped edges)...
...and she wears a pair of tangerine-colored wedge heels on her feet.  These are permanently attached, just like Loni's shoes are.
I used to like wedge heels, back in the day when I could wear high-heeled shoes.  I was never adept at wearing stilettos, but I wore the heck out of wedges and platforms.

Y'all probably saw this in some of the above pictures, but both Shara and Loni came with clear plastic X-style stands.  I've seen Barbie and some of her clones utilize stands like this, where the X bit in the center supports the legs, but these stands also have tiny pegs that fit into the dolls' feet, kinda like Dawn doll stands do.  They work pretty well.
Pretty well, mind y'all.  Shara and Loni can't balance in every pose I try to stand them in, and that takes us to joints.  For such tiny dolls the Glamour Gals are pretty well-endowed, sporting a neck joint...
...a waist joint...
...and shoulders and hips.  All of these joints rotate only but that's really good for a doll this little.
In addition, the dolls legs are wired, so I can bend their knees.  I don't do this too often because I don't want to stress those wires, but I do it every so often.
They can run, though this is one of those poses where the stand won't hold them.
They can dance, though this also requires careful balancing.
They can even...I'm not sure what Loni's trying to do here, unless she was trying to outshine my new Dawn dolls.
I took that picture on May seventh, the day I received one new Dawn doll in the mail, plus a beautiful head for that floating body that Treesa sent.  I was fussing over the two of them a bit, and I guess Loni saw the need to strut her stuff. 

I believe that covers it!

BAD
*These dolls are very small, which might be problematic if you're a fumble-fingers.
*I'm not in love with Loni's face, but that's my opinion.  Some of y'all might like Loni better than Shara.
*Uh...long discontinued?  There's not a lot bad about these dolls!

GOOD
*Few small parts to lose.  These dolls have hats, and I think Loni had a purse at one time, but they're not going to lose their clothes or shoes.
*Teeny-weeny faces have a surprising amount of personality.  Loni looks kinda snarky, and Shara looks friendly and approachable.
*I love when dolls come with stands!  The stands aren't perfect, but they're better than nothing.
*Since these dolls are small they're easily stored.  That's becoming increasingly important in Casa Pizarro.
*Surprisingly poseable!  Little dolls like this are usually pretty stiff.

I must say, Treesa had a penchant for picking out the more interesting and obscure dolls that the eighties had to offer.  There were the Blooming Dolls, and now here's these Glamour Girls.  I like the Glamour Gals quite a bit!  I've never owned a Fashion Teener, but their main flaws were their easily lost shoes and their outfits that were both tiny and frayed easily.  Glamour Gals avoid both those problems with painted shoes and outfits that are at least partially (or wholly in my dolls' cases) molded on.  Do the molded clothes cut down on these dolls' versatility?  Maybe a little, but I didn't gripe about that with my other dollhouse dolls.  Keep in mind that most of them have permanently attached clothes too.  Anyway, in addition to being small and unobtrusive the Glamour Gals had accessories, stuff like cars and dancing hovels, things that hadn't been seen since Dawn's time, so I'm surprised that these little dolls weren't a bigger hit.  Maybe they, like the Blooming Dolls, got outshone by Strawberry Shortcake and the Cabbage Patch Kids.  Still, Glamour Gals are cute examples of early eighties toys and fashion, and they'd make great little dollhouse inhabitants.  Despite my money woes, I've been casually shopping for more of these dolls on eBay, I admit it!  Camping Cutie Blair, Fancy Dancer Loni, and Golden Glitter Erin are my favorites.  And maybe Jungle Jade Jessie, since she's blonde and brown-eyed and wearing green.  Long story short, the Glamour Gals get a passing grade from me; if I were giving out letter grades I'd give 'em a B+.

Hugs,
RagingMoon1987